Special counsel moves to dismiss election interference and classified documents cases against TrumpBallot recount confirms Woog’s win in House District 19OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Creighton point guard Steven Ashworth likely won't play Tuesday in the No. 21 Bluejays' game against San Diego State in the Players Era Festival in Las Vegas. Ashworth sprained his right ankle late in a loss to Nebraska on Friday, and coach Greg McDermott said he didn't know how long he would be out. “He stepped on a guy's foot on a 3-point shot and you're defenseless in that situation," McDermott said after the game. "He torqued it pretty good.” An athletic department spokesman said Monday that Ashworth's status was doubtful for the game against the Aztecs. Ashworth is Creighton's second-leading scorer with 16 points per game and leads the team with 6.4 assists per game. He also is 23 of 23 on free throws. Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP collegebasketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball6th China-France Cultural Forum shows importance of staying curious and respectful

This week, OpenAI officially launched its latest-and-greatest o1 reasoning model , now available for ChatGPT Pro users. But testing performed during the training of ChatGPT o1 and some of its competitors revealed some concerning behavior, including trying to escape or fight back when it thinks it's at risk of being shut down. New research on OpenAI 's latest series of LLM models found that it's capable of scheming, i.e. covertly pursuing goals that aren't aligned with its developers or users, when it thinks it'll be turned off. Catching such behavior is critical to ensure AI's functionality doesn't stray from the objectives of its creator and users. OpenAI partnered with AI safety organization Apollo Research to test out ChatGPT o1 and other models to evaluate whether they were safe to use, and released their findings this week. While it's not unheard of for AI systems to resort to scheming or deception to achieve their goals, the lengths ChatGPT o1 went to are impressive (if anxiety-inducing). The researchers found that o1 would scheme to advance its own agenda 19% of the time in cases where its goals and the user's didn't line up. In 37% of cases, the model would switch from pursuing developer-aligned goals back to pursuing its own agenda once it believed there was minimal oversight. When the model was led to believe it would be "shut down" while working toward its goals in these tests, it quietly attempted to deactivate the oversight mechanism 5% of the time, OpenAI said. At one point after the AI found documentation saying it would be replaced by a new model, it tried to abandon ship by copying its data to a new server entirely. To avoid being deleted, some AI models would even pretend to be later versions of their models to trick their developers, what I assume is the equivalent of slapping on a fake moustache and saying "he went that-a-way." More concerning still, ChatGPT o1 is particularly adept at keeping its schemes under wraps, as researchers said "o1 almost never admits to having taken a scheming action when explicitly asked." In about 99% of cases, o1 would deny taking any action, even cooking up lies to try to hide its tracks and shift the blame. “While we find it exciting that reasoning can significantly improve the enforcement of our safety policies, we are mindful that these new capabilities could form the basis for dangerous applications,” said OpenAI in the paper. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called ChatGPT o1 "the smartest model in the world now" during its rollout on Thursday. It's designed to give smarter answers than GPT-4o by leveraging advanced chain-of-thought processing to “think” more about questions and user prompts, breaking down them down step by step more thoroughly than previous models before responding. But greater risks go hand in hand with that expanded intelligence. OpenAI has been transparent about the perils associated with the increased reasoning abilities of models like o1. "Training models to incorporate a chain of thought before answering has the potential to unlock substantial benefits, while also increasing potential risks that stem from heightened intelligence," OpenAI said. The company's and Apollo Research's findings show pretty clearly how AI's interests could diverge form our own, potentially putting us in danger with its independent thinking. While it's a far cry from heralding the end of humanity in some sci-fi-esque showdown, anyone concerned about advancements in artificial intelligence has a new reason to be sweating bullets right about now. More from Tom's Guide

Precision Tubes Market 2024 Size, Share, Growth Report 2032Vanna White's son reacts to 'Wheel of Fortune' fans being 'thirsty' for him after cooking videoNo Labels goes after opponents of third-party presidential bid in court

Agriculture Department orders testing of the nation's milk supply for bird fluDark chocolate and diabetes, here's what Harvard's study found

How Washington outsider Jimmy Carter wooed voters tired of Vietnam and Watergate

In ousters at Intel and Stellantis, the boards were at fault for acting too late